![]() ![]() Since the film has the word "Cloverfield" in the title, a lot of dim light bulbs thought this was a prequel or sequel to the other film and bad mouthed it because it isn't. There's a possible murder that took place prior to the film, a plot device never resolved. We've probably all seen John Goodman play a similar character before. ![]() Sound effects, usually unappreciated in non-action films, well used to add to the intensity of the drama. Story more important than special effects or pointless action sequences (always a plus for me). Director shows great promise while still early in his career. There are references in it to some popular films in the genre (that are likely film maker favorites) from the past 30 years or so. ![]() Mary Elizabeth Winstead gets better with every film she makes. Ultimately, the piece becomes perhaps one of the most enjoyable entries in its genre. ![]() It's incredibly compelling mainly because of its intense focus on character, while it's the several subtle twists and turns that keep us on the edge of our seat as our reading of the situation (always seen through the lens of the protagonist) continues to organically change. It's an incredibly intriguing and evolving mystery-thriller that's consistently entertaining and suspenseful, as it uses its small core cast of well-realised characters to drive the tension within its (mostly) single, increasingly claustrophobic location to expert effect. These issues are really only limited to a somewhat rushed finale, though, and the final result is still a much finer film than its predecessor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |